lukasandClaude Opus 5 5aa133e18c Antispam: plugin docs, the learning acceptance test, and a bootstrap that refuses bad corpora
docs/plugins.md described an SDK that no longer exists. It now covers
messages.raw/sample, actions.move_to_special, the envelope's account_id /
mailbox_special_use / account_state, the message.changed transition payload, the
message.actions.menu slot, Slot.title and .wm-menu-item — with the reasons, not
just the signatures. M3's acceptance is that a plugin can be written from this
file alone, and it had drifted.

Acceptance 4 (§C.8): a test that teaches 20 spam + 20 ham to a real engine and
checks the classifier generalises to held-out mail, keeps ham under the banner
threshold, and does not leak between users. It skips when no engine is reachable.
It does NOT assert the literal move_threshold — a synthetic fixture cannot reach
12.0 once the SMTP-time symbols are zeroed, which is the whole point of the
tuning. Recorded as OQ-8 rather than quietly asserting something weaker.

Bayes ignores training until min_learns, stock 200. For a personal mailbox that
means every correction appears to be ignored for months, so it is now 20.

The bootstrap would have made this filter worse. Accounts do not sync their
provider's spam folder by default, so the real corpus here is 3 junk beside 1,294
aged inbox — teaching both as found trains "everything is ham". It now refuses
below 10 spam samples (leaving the account unmarked so a later run can do it
properly) and otherwise caps ham at 3x the spam count.

Run against the live account, it correctly declined:
  "only 3 spam samples (need 10); enable spam-folder sync to build a corpus"

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018SqJYt7jD7oUEkoY68sBZo
2026-09-17 20:34:50 +02:00
S
Description
No description provided
11 MiB
Languages
Python 57.3%
TypeScript 31.7%
JavaScript 8.1%
Shell 1.5%
HTML 0.8%
Other 0.5%